6.2. Appendix 2: General reference Texts, examples of methodological critique

From wirkt.hangar.org
Revision as of 17:08, 23 June 2015 by Marta (talk | contribs) (Es crea la pàgina amb «[http://www.research-arts.net/ra_researching.html RESEARCH ARTS sept 2013] It includes recent papers by Penny, Parés and Seebach : What do we mean with interdiscipli...».)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RESEARCH ARTS sept 2013 It includes recent papers by Penny, Parés and Seebach : What do we mean with interdisciplinarity and why do we care? By Simon Penny A physicist, a sociologist and an artist come into a bar... - What is the impact of humor on different types interdisciplinary projects? By Swen Seebach. The cultural relevance of interdisciplinarity in the context of an unsustainable technified hyper-consumeristic society. By Roc Parés.

Hubert Dreyfus – What computers still can’t do. Philip Agre – Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI Emily Martin- The Egg and the Sperm. Anthony Chemero - Rat behavior experiments (need ref) Ed Vul - Voodoo correlations in FMRI studies. http://www.edvul.com/voodoocorr.php Voodoo Correlations are everywhere http://pps.sagepub.com/content/6/2/163 "In general, paradigms can be understood as conventional setups for producing idealized, inflated effects."

White Paper on the Interrelation of Art, Science and Technology in Spain. (Even though the economical historical context has changed a lot since the mid 90's I still suggest reading the Conclusions and Recommendations in pages 149 to 154. RP- need ref)

ONTOLOGY AND ANTIDISCIPLINARITY Andrew Pickering in A Barry and G Born (eds), interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the natural and social sciences.

ART-SCIENCE
From public understanding to public experiment Georgina Born and Andrew Barry. Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2010 ISSN 1753-0350 print/1753-0369 online/10/010103-17
– 2010 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/17530351003617610